33 . Const. P. 114/2025 (S.B.) Mst. Zoya and another V/S The Province of Sindh and others Sindh High Court, Karachi Additionally, the main objectives from the police will be to apprehend offenders, investigate crimes, and prosecute them before the Courts, also to prevent the commission of crime, and previously mentioned all, be certain regulation and order to protect citizens' lives and property. The legislation enjoins the police being scrupulously fair on the offender as well as Magistracy is to make certain a fair investigation and fair trial for an offender. Unfortunately, these objectives have remained unfulfilled. Deviations of police officers and police excesses in dealing with the regulation and order situation have been the topic of adverse comments from this Court as well as from other Courts, Nevertheless they have didn't have any corrective effect on it.
Official database for searching and viewing federal court dockets and case documents. Small fees implement.
Matter:-HARASSMENT Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Writer) Const. P. 235/2025 (S.B.) Atif S/o Latif V/S Province of Sindh and others Sindh High Court, Karachi SHC Citation: SHC-252216 Tag:The law enjoins the police to generally be scrupulously fair into the offender and also the Magistracy is to make sure a fair investigation and fair trial for an offender. Unfortunately, these objectives have remained unfulfilled. Aberrations of police officers and police excesses in dealing with the regulation and order situation have been the subject of adverse comments from this Court together with from other courts However they have did not have any corrective effect on it. The police has the power to arrest a person even without obtaining a warrant of arrest from a court.
The ruling with the first court created case law that must be accompanied by other courts until finally or Until possibly new legislation is created, or simply a higher court rules differently.
149 . Const. P. 6193/2016 (D.B.) Syed Musawar Shah V/S M.D CSD and Ors Sindh High Court, Karachi First and foremost, we would address the issue of maintainability of the moment Petition under Article 199 of your Constitution based on the doctrine of laches as this petition was filed in 2016, whereas the alleged cause of action accrued to the petitioner in 1992. The petitioner asserts that he pursued his legal remedy just after involvement from the FIR lodged by FIA and from the intervening period the respondent dismissed him from service where after he preferred petition No.
However it's made distinct that police is free to get action against any person that's indulged in criminal activities subject to law. However no harassment shall be caused into the petitioner, if she acts within the bonds of regulation. Police shall also make certain respect from the family shed in accordance with legislation and should they have reasonable ground to prevent the congnizable offence they can act, so far as raiding the house is concerned the police shall protected concrete evidence and procure necessary permission from the concerned high police official/Magistrate like a issue of security from the house is concerned, which isn't public place under the Act 1977. nine. Taking into consideration the aforementioned details, the objective of filing this petition has been realized. Consequently, this petition is hereby disposed of from the terms stated over. Read more
PLR is really a revolutionizing platform democratizing and making legal research easy and accessible in Pakistan :
Various judgments have affirmed that the mere registration of a crime does not constitute a "public interest" justification for restricting a person's liberty. Therefore, the Respondent's actions in putting the Petitioner's name on the ECL based around the criminal case are inconsistent with established legal principles. For that reason, this petition must be allowed Read more
163 . Const. P. 4965/2023 (D.B.) Saleem Khan V/S Province of Sindh & Others Sindh High Court, Karachi It really is well-settled that even though thinking about the case of normal promotion of civil servants, the competent authority must take into account the advantage of the many suitable candidates read more and after thanks deliberations, to grant promotion to this kind of suitable candidates that are found to get most meritorious among them. Because the petitioner was held to get senior to his colleagues who were promoted in BS-19, the petitioner was dismissed from the respondent department just to extend favor on the blue-eyed candidate based on OPS, which is apathy on the part of the respondent department.
The law of necessity regarded and upheld by Pakistan's highest judicial body has proved an honorable protection for military adventure in civil government.it absolutely was the illegal action called regulation of necessity..
Therefore, this petition is hereby disposed of during the terms stated higher than. However no harassment shall be caused to either party and the case shall be decided because of the competent court of legislation if pending. Read more
The appellate court determined that the trial court had not erred in its decision to allow more time for information for being gathered with the parties – specifically regarding the issue of absolute immunity.
171 . Const. P. 1832/2019 (D.B.) Muhammad Fakhar ul Hasnain V/S Province of Sindh & Others Sindh High Court, Karachi It truly is very well founded now that the provision for proforma promotion is not alien or unfamiliar to the civil servant service structure but it is already embedded in Fundamental Rule 17, wherein it's lucidly enumerated that the appointing authority may possibly if glad that a civil servant who was entitled to get promoted from a particular date was, for no fault of his personal, wrongfully prevented from rendering service to the Federation/ province in the higher post, direct that such civil servant shall be paid the arrears of spend and allowances of this kind of higher post through proforma promotion or upgradation arising from the antedated fixation of his/her seniority. Read more
The uncovered Tribunal shall decide the case on merits, without being influenced from the findings while in the Impugned order, after recording of evidence from the respective parties. Read more